Comments on: GRITtv Live at Noon: Bank of America: Bad For Consumers?

By: ellwort

ellwort — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:04:31 +0000

BOA Stiffs Taxpayers on Fee

Evidently Geithner didn’t follow through. Surprise! http://tinyurl.com/lkyy86

By: John

John — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:57:21 +0000

I can’t believe the question mark at the end of this post title. There isn’t ONE of these outfits that’s “good for consumers.” Consumers are only sheep to be shorn.

By: Gitcheegumee

Gitcheegumee — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:49:13 +0000

I NEVER dealt with them-same for Chase.

By: xargaw

xargaw — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:39:19 +0000

Any business or person that has dealt a lot with this bank, left BofA decades ago. They were the most difficult to deal with concerning the simplist transactions and the most customer unfriendly. Years ago, I attended a seminar of professionals where our clients were primarily banks and S&Ls. No one had a good thing to say about BofA, and when a representative from BofA spoke as part of a panel, the rep was pummeled with compliants and questions about their ridiculous policies. I don’t have any recent experience with them because I wrote them off years ago, but there seemed to be a real lack of common sense in the management.

By: Gitcheegumee

Gitcheegumee — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:29:43 +0000

Speaking of egregious agreements, has anyone seen THIS yet?

Wall Street’s Private Judicial System Exposed as a Fraud
Pam Martens, CounterPunch
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: The National Arbitration Forum isn’t impartial — it’s financially shackled to debt collection law firms representing major credit card companies.

By: egregious

egregious — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:14:25 +0000

Thanks Laura